Photos of very heavy weather for QE2 & QV on their Transatlantic crossing
Welcome to Cruising Talk®
Join our cruise message board (cruise forum) today to connect with other cruisers, share cruise reviews, cruise photos, browse through the cruise line profiles and much more. Other related sections include cruise destinations, cruise web cams, cruise styles and river cruising.
Surprised about the comment about passengers being more tolerant of roll than pitch. I certainly get pretty nervous when they roll, but not at all bothered at pitch.
OK, Russell. You got me. I was transfering my feelings to others, and from years of psychological tests (administering, not taking) I know that can't be done. I will stand behind rolling being easier on the ship than pitching, however. If you are far forward or far aft during pitching, you will experience periods of weightlessness alternating with multiple-g-force weight. That is very uncomfortable for me.
Although we've been on QE2 twice, we were lucky enough to have fair seas. The second time I was anxious because we had to cross the Bay of Biscay but it was only force 5, so no problem (although there were still people suffering from seasickness)
I'm no expert, but does QE2 pitch rather than roll, which makes her more stable in rough seas??
Re the debate over QV, she wasnt' built for regular transatlantic voyages - that is QM2's role, and she has many innovative engineering features to enable a ship of her size and height to cross the Atlantic in safety and at the speed required to maintain the 6 day schedule. There have been several interesting programmes about the building of QM2 and the problems which had to be overcome.
Obviously, QV will have to make the crossing at various times but her primary role is one of cruising, still I don't think I would want to have been a passenger on that particular cruise!
I'm no expert, but does QE2 pitch rather than roll, which makes her more stable in rough seas??
All ships both pitch and roll. If the ship is heading straight into or away from the seas (taking the swells on the bow or the stern), it will pitch. That means the bow is alternately rising and falling. If the seas are being taken on the beam (the side of the ship) it will roll. If the ship is crossing the swells at a 45 degree angle it will pitch and roll at the same time, a situation sometimes refered to as "bucking". Although any violent motion can cause damage to a ship, rolling is less likely to structurally damage the ship than is pitching or bucking. I could go into a discussion of righting moment, center of gravity, center of bouyancy, and some other statistics that determine how much and how quickly the ship will move, but I won't unless somebody wants me to.
All ships both pitch and roll. If the ship is heading straight into or away from the seas (taking the swells on the bow or the stern), it will pitch. That means the bow is alternately rising and falling. If the seas are being taken on the beam (the side of the ship) it will roll. If the ship is crossing the swells at a 45 degree angle it will pitch and roll at the same time, a situation sometimes refered to as "bucking". Although any violent motion can cause damage to a ship, rolling is less likely to structurally damage the ship than is pitching or bucking. I could go into a discussion of righting moment, center of gravity, center of bouyancy, and some other statistics that determine how much and how quickly the ship will move, but I won't unless somebody wants me to.
Larry, that explanation might well be very helpful...especially to first timers who are unsure about the best cabin position, whether they will be more likely to be unwell with seasickness at certain parts of a ship...and also to help explain why pitching and rolling can be uncomfortable etc.
If you would like to post some sort of explanation in layman terms about the differences, causes and so forth, then please go ahead and do so in the first time cruiser section, please...I am sure many will be interested in why a ship behaves in different ways in weather
1965 - Cunard Queen Mary
1967 - Cunard Queen Elizabeth
1970 - Cunard Queen Elizabeth 2
1971 - P&O Oriana
1972 - SS France
1975 - SS Leopard
1977 - P&O Canberra
2005 - NCL Norwegian Jewel - Shakedown Cruise - Jersey
2005/6 - NCL Norwegian Crown - Chile, Cape Horn, Falkland Islands, Uruguay & Argentina - Christmas/New Year cruise
2006 - Fred Olsen Braemar Mini Cruise - Amsterdam & Zeebrugge
2007 - Fred Olsen Braemar Transatlantic - Jamaica, Cuba, Bahamas, Bermuda & Azores
2007 - Fred Olsen Braemar Mini Cruise - Guernsey & Amsterdam
2007 - NCL Norwegian Gem - Shakedown Cruise - Amsterdam
2008 - Costa Allegra - Hong Kong, Philippines, Borneo, Brunei, Singapore, Saigon, Da-Nang & Sanya
Coming up next.....
10/10/2009 - Costa Classica - Grand Oriental Cruise - Shanghai, Nagasaki, Tokyo, Kobe, Naha, Keelung and Hong Kong - 16 Nights Cruising in: 321 day(s), 12 hour(s), 3 minute(s)
Thanks Larry for the explaination I'm a sit on the deck watching the sea go by person, I'll now be able to look out for the tell tale signs in the waves and swells.
Thanks again
__________________
Middy
Cruises completed on.
Edinburgh Castle, Thomson Topaz, MV Van Gogh (2) Thomson Emerald. Airtours Seawing. Thomson Spirit. Princess Sun. Thomson Celebration (2). Splendour of the Seas. Celebrity Constellation. Fred Olsen Braemar.Thomson Calypso (2). NCL Gem, Celebrity Century, Independence of the Seas